<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More Family 2.0 (I got dissed by cnet)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webthingsconsidered.com/2006/06/02/more-family-20/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webthingsconsidered.com/2006/06/02/more-family-20/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 30 Jul 2011 18:47:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.webthingsconsidered.com/2006/06/02/more-family-20/comment-page-1/#comment-126</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 04:52:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webthingsconsidered.com/?p=131#comment-126</guid>
		<description>Hi Rachel, thanks for stopping by.  I&#039;m not too worried about it, I know it&#039;s a pretty easy jump from web 2.0 to family 2.0 for someone looking for a catchy phrase.  Plus, you&#039;ve done most of the work in pushing this space.  I&#039;m just trying to stir up what little controversy I can.  Gotta make a name somehow ;-).  I do appreciate you mentioning me for the report.

I&#039;ll take the podshow discussion offline and email you.  I think you guys should definitely pursue this, as you&#039;re doing very well with getting this area noticed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Rachel, thanks for stopping by.  I&#8217;m not too worried about it, I know it&#8217;s a pretty easy jump from web 2.0 to family 2.0 for someone looking for a catchy phrase.  Plus, you&#8217;ve done most of the work in pushing this space.  I&#8217;m just trying to stir up what little controversy I can.  Gotta make a name somehow <img src='http://www.webthingsconsidered.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .  I do appreciate you mentioning me for the report.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll take the podshow discussion offline and email you.  I think you guys should definitely pursue this, as you&#8217;re doing very well with getting this area noticed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://www.webthingsconsidered.com/2006/06/02/more-family-20/comment-page-1/#comment-125</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jun 2006 04:38:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webthingsconsidered.com/?p=131#comment-125</guid>
		<description>Good point Paul, it does give the press something to latch onto.  Thanks for backing me up :-).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point Paul, it does give the press something to latch onto.  Thanks for backing me up <img src='http://www.webthingsconsidered.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Talking tech on Family 2.0 (a niche of Web 2.0) &#187; Family 2.0</title>
		<link>http://www.webthingsconsidered.com/2006/06/02/more-family-20/comment-page-1/#comment-124</link>
		<dc:creator>Talking tech on Family 2.0 (a niche of Web 2.0) &#187; Family 2.0</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 02:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webthingsconsidered.com/?p=131#comment-124</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: Webthingsconsidered [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Update: Webthingsconsidered [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rachel</title>
		<link>http://www.webthingsconsidered.com/2006/06/02/more-family-20/comment-page-1/#comment-123</link>
		<dc:creator>Rachel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jun 2006 01:56:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webthingsconsidered.com/?p=131#comment-123</guid>
		<description>Hey Ryan,

Lets do something together on this - A friend of mine interviews CEO and founders on Web 2.0 sites and sometimes interviews in the niche Family 2.0. Why don&#039;t we get together and set up a show with us three talking about the space. You coined the term in your blog, I started to evangelize the space and my friend interview&#039;s them in Podcasts, so I think it&#039;s an opportunity waiting to happen, what do you think?

Don&#039;t worry all the info on the companies in the article was sourced from my blog, and that wasn&#039;t mentioned as a source - I am not worried about this as the more work I do on this, the more PR will occur and in the end the space gets noticed. I am not saying I am an expert with dealing with traditional media, but it just goes with the territory. I think we just need to get profile and command presence just like Cnet and work on getting ourselves known.

With the report you are talking about, when she contacted me, I was very clear that you were the one that coined the term and to contact you to find out more, which I would love to interview you and post on my site...and I mentioned that I can only be responsible for wanting to evangelize the space to get the word out there.

Let me know, I think it would be a great to set up a Family 2.0 podshow together. I could definitely get some sponsors and kick it off.

best,
Rachel</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ryan,</p>
<p>Lets do something together on this &#8211; A friend of mine interviews CEO and founders on Web 2.0 sites and sometimes interviews in the niche Family 2.0. Why don&#8217;t we get together and set up a show with us three talking about the space. You coined the term in your blog, I started to evangelize the space and my friend interview&#8217;s them in Podcasts, so I think it&#8217;s an opportunity waiting to happen, what do you think?</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t worry all the info on the companies in the article was sourced from my blog, and that wasn&#8217;t mentioned as a source &#8211; I am not worried about this as the more work I do on this, the more PR will occur and in the end the space gets noticed. I am not saying I am an expert with dealing with traditional media, but it just goes with the territory. I think we just need to get profile and command presence just like Cnet and work on getting ourselves known.</p>
<p>With the report you are talking about, when she contacted me, I was very clear that you were the one that coined the term and to contact you to find out more, which I would love to interview you and post on my site&#8230;and I mentioned that I can only be responsible for wanting to evangelize the space to get the word out there.</p>
<p>Let me know, I think it would be a great to set up a Family 2.0 podshow together. I could definitely get some sponsors and kick it off.</p>
<p>best,<br />
Rachel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Berry</title>
		<link>http://www.webthingsconsidered.com/2006/06/02/more-family-20/comment-page-1/#comment-122</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Berry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2006 19:33:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webthingsconsidered.com/?p=131#comment-122</guid>
		<description>Hey Ryan -- we&#039;ll testify for you on that! We&#039;re a little wary of all these 2.0 markings and are still a bit nervous to go about with that in the title, but the press seems to &quot;get it&quot;

Thanks for the inclusion and the phrase

Cheers
Paul Berry
http://www.amiglia.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Ryan &#8212; we&#8217;ll testify for you on that! We&#8217;re a little wary of all these 2.0 markings and are still a bit nervous to go about with that in the title, but the press seems to &#8220;get it&#8221;</p>
<p>Thanks for the inclusion and the phrase</p>
<p>Cheers<br />
Paul Berry<br />
<a href="http://www.amiglia.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.amiglia.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

